The Commission is charged with developing a new vision for the University within the context of the University's mission and budget, while reaffirming our commitment to quality, access and affordability. UC will continue to play a vital role in sustaining California's economy and cultural life, operating strategically and as efficiently as possible within available resources.
UC's long-held governing principles of maintaining access, affordability and the highest levels of quality in instruction, research, public service and health care have guided the policy decisions of this great University. In today's budgetary climate, these principles are becoming, in essence, what economists call "competing goods:" One cannot be altered without affecting the value of others. Even a world-class research institution such as our own does not have the resources to maximize all competing goods simultaneously.
In the past, many policy decisions at UC were made one at a time, often without considering the impact of changing one variable upon the others. Going forward, we must take a competing goods approach: Each solution will affect others to follow. Any increase in support in one area inevitably has opportunity costs for other priorities.
The Commission and five working groups will identify multiple positive attributes worthy of promoting, but priorities must be established to balance the budget. Some of these "competing" attributes include:
The overarching task is to define an overall balance among these priorities that is consistent with UC's mission, commitment to quality, and best serves California.
The working groups – which will focus on the size and shape of UC, its education and curriculum, access and affordability, and funding and research strategies – are composed of a wide spectrum of members drawn from the Regents, faculty, students, alumni, administration, staff and other experts not affiliated with UC. Much of the expertise lies with our extraordinary faculty. Because competing goals may span multiple workgroups, the Commission, as a coordinating and deciding body, will expect strong communication and coordination among the working group chairs. Close consultation with the Academic Senate is essential for recommendations pertaining to curriculum and other core faculty responsibilities.
The Commission and working groups will rely on previous and ongoing studies by the Office of the President, Academic Senate, campuses, and faculty researchers in their deliberations. Implementation of recommendations will be subject to traditional review by the Academic Senate in the areas for which it has delegated authority. For recommendations in all other areas, the Academic Senate will have full opportunity for consultation and review.